The one comment I received two posts ago, and it was a good one, mentioned how the media make much of the current forms of communication:  text messaging, Facebook, Twitter, etc.  I sometimes think the “news” is a commercial for those services.

We saw similar commentary about Seattle in 1999.  At the time, email was a newly popular thing. Let’s take a step back and put this in perspective. Every revolution, like every major event that happens to people, makes use of communication.  (No Shamwow, Sherlock.)  In whatever time and place, it uses whatever communication is useful in that time and place.  For the American War of Independence, it was the printing press, lanterns hung in a belfry, and Ben Franklin’s Post Office.  For the Russian Revolution, it was the wireless telegraph.  No one attributes either of those events to the means of communication used at the time.

I don’t want to disparage anyone who is using the latest & greatest communication in the service of a good cause.  I’ve ranted quite a bit here about communication and how to use it. But guys, it takes more than that to get flesh to move.  I’ve tried it.  Throughout the recent antiwar movement, I saw how, no matter how many emails and postcards we sent, or how nicely the information was packaged on web sites, the size of antiwar demos and other actions steadily diminished from  early 2003 to the present, not just locally, but everywhere. It takes more than communication.  I’ll try to treat this subject a little more down below.

Another thing…. When covering Egypt, the media were obsessed with the size of demonstrations, as if to say “All you need is to get enough people demonstrating, and the regime will crumble.”  That sounds like giving any would-be revolutionaries instructions for suicide.  Sorry, folks.  Demos and marches don’t make the government change any more than military parades win wars.  For a better description of what actually happened in Egypt, see:  http://www.zcommunications.org/why-mubarak-fell-by-michael-schwartz.  The “demonstrations” in Egypt were, in effect, a general strike.  Also, they were nonviolent only in the sense that they did not INITIATE violence.  When thugs attacked them, they defended themselves violently.

Stepping back now to Seattle, the size of the crowd was a secondary thing.  Delegates to the WTO conference were physically blocked from attending by well-planned actions.  People decided to break the law and take their lumps (quite literally) to make that happen.

Mass communication is great for informing people about the issues.  Mass demos are great for raising people’s spirits and making a little show of POTENTIAL force.  Ultimately, though, people need a motivation to actually DO something, and it must come in what they see in their daily lives. Something needs to make it clear to people that:  “Something is happening that is more important than going to work today, doing my laundry, or the latest episode of my favorite tv show, and it’s up to ME to do it.”  It’s been a very long time since many Americans have thought that way. So what leads people to start thinking that way?

“…all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed.”

World food prices are now at an all-time high, and that’s very likely to be a factor in the rebellions we’re seeing now.  Both the French and the Russian revolutions were preceded by famines. Hossam el-Hamalawy gives us some clues when he mentions large labor actions that preceded the uprising in Egypt by a couple of years.

Now think about that.  Labor unions are mainly about the most immediate bread-and-butter issues for their own members.  They don’t need any  abstract ideology.  They don’t need to demonize their opponents.  All that’s needed to motivate their members is a prospect of more money in their pockets.

This “fight to make a better life for me” is largely missing in our own country, among the people who most need it.  There are lots of explanations for that, which I won’t try to get into right now.

Those are my only thoughts right now about motivations that might be needed.  Another question is:  at what point do people overcome their fear of repression?  What’s the point of no return, when they decide they have nothing to lose by going on, breaking the law, and taking the risk of getting “disappeared”?  When does the endless cycle in the picture above finally become intolerable? All this is just a restatement of that question at the end of “From a spark, a flame”, a few entries ago.  No replies yet.  No one ready to stick his neck out?

This entry was posted in communication, organizing, politics and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.


  1. vangee says:

    right on babe!

  2. Anonymous says:

    Motivation adds momentum to a mass movement. Does an individual matter and how much does individuality matter in the commitment, depth and reach of the actions of the individual while participating? If one forgoes fear of repression and is motivated to act in a non-violent manner – yet is committed to a relationship where another is not in agreement and sees only trouble in that action, is the mass movement aware or empathetic to the reality of differences in the tolerance (and experience) of repression and repercussions?
    For that consideration, sometimes motivation is a matter of teaching another to become aware of a new reality. I liken the process to learning a language that opens the mind.
    Sometimes motivation is a learning experience that is shared on the most personal level rather than on the level of the masses.
    Making an effort to open the imagination of one special person is a potent and less visible motivation, and is not without its own repercussions on a private scale.
    As well, consider that a “point of no return” is sometimes another’s experience of an earlier existence in other times that had to be coped with or learned with growing to adulthood.
    The experience of another’s life on a similar road to progress is not to be discounted but to be aware of for wisdom to be learned, if there.
    From embers a flame can arise with some care. Not all motivations are meant for the streets and crowds. Some need to glow for awhile before the embers take flame.

  3. rebeccabarrett says:

    I liked the little image! I do wish the Dems had pushed more when we had a huge majority in Congress. A lot in the Latino community are rather irked that now Obama is paying attention to their issues right before an election and while the GOP has control of the House. It would had been easier to pass good immigration reform with the old House.

  4. paper doll says:

    It would had been easier to pass good immigration reform with the old House.

    That’s why the Dems spent their majority years sitting on their behinds and then giving the health care industry complex exactly what it wanted….to do that, but to also stop any other traditional Dem agenda from happening during their majority . They know what they are doing. It’s just not what we would want them to do

  5. Pingback: New Blood | kitchenmudge

  6. Pingback: LAUNCH OF THE CARNADA | kitchenmudge

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s